MEMO · TO readers evaluating a workshop or a speaker · RE Strategy

Insights Strategy

Is your business ready for AI? Start with these five questions

A diagnostic framework for identifying whether a business is actually positioned to operationalise AI tools, not just experiment with them. The same framework the Executive Programme is built on.

Download branded PDF report
Terence Kok

About the author

Terence Kok

AI Governance & Assurance Practice. Enterprise AI Strategist and Keynote Speaker

Enterprise AI strategist and former Chief AI and Innovation Officer at Meinhardt Group, with twenty-five years leading transformation programmes across Asia and the Middle East, specialising in impact assessment, governance and deployment methodology.

Read the full profile ›

Most organisations that fail at AI deployment are not failing because the technology is flawed. They are failing because they never checked whether the organisation itself was ready to receive it, and rushed procurement in its place creates what is best described as operational debt rather than value. McKinsey has found that seventy-eight percent of companies now use AI frequently, yet only thirty-three percent have scaled it company-wide. MIT's NANDA initiative puts the number of pilots that produce lasting profit at just five percent. In Singapore, government data shows AI adoption among small businesses has tripled to 14.5 percent, adoption that readiness has not kept pace with.

Exhibit · Where readiness lags adoption

Adoption has outrun operational readiness

  1. 78%

    of companies use AI frequently

  2. 33%

    have scaled it company-wide

  3. 5%

    of pilots produce lasting profit, per MIT NANDA

14.5%

SG small-business AI adoption, tripled. Readiness hasn't kept pace

The five-dimension framework starts with data readiness, because every other dimension depends on it: can the organisation access data that is clean, documented and current. Process definition follows, a test as concrete as whether a new employee could follow the process being automated on their first day, since an ambiguous process will resurface as unpredictable AI behaviour. Governance structure asks who reviews AI output before it reaches a user and what happens when it is wrong, a question that applies as much to a one-person business drafting customer emails with AI as it does to an enterprise.

The fourth dimension, team capability, asks whether staff can operate, review and correct the system without outside help, because a tool nobody on staff understands becomes a black box where nobody is sure whether its output is right. The fifth, measurement, requires the business outcome to be defined and baselined before deployment begins, since without a baseline, no later improvement can be credibly attributed to the AI system at all.

Exhibit · The diagnostic

Five questions, asked in sequence

  1. 01

    Data readiness

    Can the organisation access data that is clean, documented and current?

  2. 02

    Process definition

    Could a new employee follow the process being automated on their first day?

  3. 03

    Governance structure

    Who reviews AI output before it reaches a user, and what happens when it is wrong?

  4. 04

    Team capability

    Can staff operate, review and correct the system without outside help?

  5. 05

    Measurement

    Is the business outcome defined and baselined before deployment begins?

Taken together the five questions are not a checklist to complete once. They are the diagnostic a leadership team should be able to answer, specifically, for its own organisation, before the next AI budget is approved, and it is the same five-dimension model the Executive Programme scores live during its half-day session.

Reference

This piece is adapted for Praxora Lab from the original. Originally published at terencekok.com ›

Dr. Jayarethanam Pillai

Before you go

The number that stops me every time I reread this piece is MIT's: five percent of AI pilots produce lasting profit. I have spent a career building diagnostic instruments for institutions before they commit funding, at the American University of Central Asia and later for UNDP delegations, and the pattern Terence describes here is the same one I watched play out in accreditation reviews: an institution assumes it is ready because it wants to be, and nobody checked the actual dimensions until an external reviewer forced the question. Answer his five questions honestly before your next AI budget is approved. I mean honestly, not optimistically.

Signature, Jayarethanam Pillai